top of page
Search

Before the Purpose of Residential Child Care Is Defined

amanda0646
Sep 4
2 min read

Updated: Sep 10


Residential child care is once again being reshaped.

Government has already stated that residential care should be used for fewer children, while expanding fostering and developing a smaller, more specialised residential sector.

But before residential child care is redefined, there is a more fundamental question:

What does the evidence actually tell us?

This critical narrative review looks beyond children’s homes themselves to the wider history of children’s social care. It examines how changes to fostering, adoption, family support, youth justice, secure care, leaving care, commissioning, regulation and the market have repeatedly changed who enters residential care and what residential care is expected to do.

It asks what successive reforms achieved, what they displaced, what was learned, what was forgotten and what may have been lost as one reform followed another.

Most importantly, it asks whether the current review of the children’s homes workforce is genuinely at liberty to discover that the direction already set by government may need to change.

Residential child care has never had a single purpose.

Children do not arrive in it without a history.

And the evidence cannot be understood by looking at residential care in isolation.


This is a substantial critical narrative review of approximately 50,000 words.


Amanda Knowles MBE

First published 3 September 2026

Updated 9 September 2026

Update note, 9 September 2026

This review was first published on 3 September 2026. It has been updated to take account of the Department for Education’s Enduring relationships strategy, published on 4 September 2026, and a parliamentary answer published on 10 June 2026, identified during the update process, concerning the assumptions used to estimate demand for 10,000 additional foster places.

The update does not change the central argument of the review. It adds further evidence relevant to the stated direction for residential care and refines the questions about the evidence underpinning the proposed shift towards fostering.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
When Innovation Needs a Failing Past

Sarah Anderson’s LinkedIn post sent me back to a Times article published when Now Foster launched. She had seen the posts celebrating Now Foster’s Weekenders programme at the House of Lords and questi

 
 
 
Two Truths

Residential care was not absent from the Independent Review of Children’s Social Care. But the residential caregiver, the person sharing a child’s daily life, was much harder to see. This paper asks w

 
 
 
What Price a Child's Future?

This paper asks whether the evidence supports the assumptions behind current children’s social care reform, and what happens to children if those assumptions prove wrong.

 
 

Comments

bottom of page